Key Takeaways:

  • Quantum meruit is a legal doctrine ensuring fair payment for services when no enforceable contract exists.
  • It applies in cases where a contract is unenforceable, void, or lacks clear compensation terms.
  • The claim requires proving services were requested, accepted, and understood to be paid for.
  • Courts determine compensation based on fair market value, service quality, and circumstances.
  • Unjust enrichment differs from quantum meruit; the latter focuses on reasonable compensation, not merely the act of non-payment.
  • This doctrine is commonly used in construction, legal services, and other professional fields.

A quantum meruit claim relates to the amount paid for services if a contract doesn't exist.

What is a Quantum Meruit Claim?

Quantum meruit, which is a Latin term, means "as much as he had earned." This term references the specific value of services provided. In legal usage, quantum meruit states that someone must not be forced to pay an amount that exceeds the total cost of services.

Since quantum meruit is a payment, it can apply as a civil lawsuit remedy. This occurs when a transaction for services and goods occurred without a written contract that states the total amount due. If someone sues for payment, the courts will calculate the cost based on the time and typical pay rate. 

Examples of quantum meruit include legal work performed without a contract, emergency aid provided by a physician, or determining the total amount due when the task ended unexpectedly. Another quantum meruit claim occurs when an individual had made a promise to pay or offer a service in exchange for other services. However, the individual died before completing the deal, so the other party can claim quantum meruit.

Quantum meruit originates from common law principles aimed at preventing unjust enrichment. It is classified under quasi-contractual obligations, which are designed to enforce fairness in situations where no express contract exists. Courts have historically used quantum meruit to prevent one party from benefiting unfairly from another’s labor or services without compensation.

This doctrine plays a crucial role in contract law, particularly when agreements are terminated prematurely or are deemed unenforceable due to ambiguity or legal defects. In modern legal systems, quantum meruit is often invoked in contract disputes, employment claims, and service-based industries where compensation terms are unclear.

Quantum Meruit Usage

It's important to prove that quantum meruit exists since it can be confused with unjust enrichment. Both prevent one party from taking advantage of the other and receiving services without paying for them. However, unjust enrichment focuses on failing to pay aspect whereas quantum meruit deals with the amount owed. 

Quantum meruit occurs when you receive services from another party, oftentimes unexpected, without signing a contract stating payment or knowing what the price is.  You do not need a written agreement to establish a contract-based relationship. If you provide services to a separate party, who either asked or accepted these services, and that party knows those services are not free, a contract exists. 

If the other party fails or refuses to pay, you can file a civil lawsuit. You will need to prove that you asked for the services or had a chance to decline them if you didn't intend to pay. Providing services without allowing you an opportunity to decline doesn't usually land under the quantum meruit theory.

On the other hand, if you enter the contract and the provider didn't complete the services, you can bring the issue of fair payment to court. The other party might not finish the service due to a variety of reasons, such as an accident on the job. 

In case the work is not completed, you can apply the theory of quantum meruit to figure if you owe any money. If you do, the courts can determine the amount and who should receive it. The court's decision depends on several factors:

  • The contract's specifics
  • The type of services performed
  • The circumstances that caused the work to stop

In order to have a successful quantum meruit claim, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant agreed to the services provided by the plaintiff and expected to pay the plaintiff. The plaintiff also must prove that the defendant was unjustly enriched, which means that the party received goods or services at no cost.

When judgment is given in a quantum meruit case, especially if there is no written contract stating a specific monetary amount, the courts decide the amount. The total usually comes from a fair market value for the services provided. 

Differences Between Quantum Meruit and Unjust Enrichment

Quantum meruit and unjust enrichment are closely related but distinct legal concepts. While both address situations where one party benefits at another’s expense, they differ in their application:

  1. Quantum Meruit – Focuses on compensation for services rendered, ensuring the service provider receives fair value for their work, even if no formal contract exists.
  2. Unjust Enrichment – Deals with preventing one party from unfairly profiting from another’s labor or resources, regardless of whether services were explicitly provided.

A quantum meruit claim must establish that the defendant accepted and benefited from the services, while an unjust enrichment claim typically arises when a party receives something of value but refuses to compensate for it.

When Can a Claim on a Quantum Meruit Arise?

If there is no specific amount set for work completed under an agreement, a quantum meruit claim can occur. It can also arise when there's a contract if any of the following occur:

  • At the request of the owner, work is completed.
  • The contract cannot be enforced or is void.
  • There is an agreement to pay a specific sum.

Common Scenarios Where Quantum Meruit Applies

Quantum meruit claims frequently arise in the following situations:

  • Construction and Contracting Work: If a contractor provides work beyond the scope of an agreement without a clear price, they may claim compensation based on quantum meruit.
  • Legal and Professional Services: Attorneys or consultants who provide services without a formal contract but with the client’s expectation of payment can seek payment under quantum meruit.
  • Employment and Commission-Based Work: Workers who complete tasks but lack a formal agreement on compensation may file a claim if their efforts benefitted the employer.
  • Medical and Emergency Services: Medical professionals providing necessary emergency care to a patient who later refuses to pay may be entitled to compensation under quantum meruit.
  • Cancelled or Unenforceable Contracts: If an agreement is terminated prematurely, the party that has already provided partial services may claim payment for the work completed.

What is a Reasonable Sum?

When determining what a reasonable sum is, the courts take several factors into consideration:

  • The conditions of the site
  • The overall quality of the work
  • The commercial rate of the work
  • If the contract states specific prices or formulas

The purpose of quantum meruit is to give justice to a wronged party. The decided amount oftentimes depends upon the specific situation. As a result, an individual might receive anywhere from the full value to only the costs to nothing.

How Courts Determine Compensation in Quantum Meruit Cases

When courts evaluate a quantum meruit claim, they consider several factors to determine appropriate compensation:

  • Fair Market Value: Payment is typically calculated based on the industry standard rate for the services provided.
  • Scope and Quality of Services: The extent and quality of work completed impact the compensation amount.
  • Circumstances of Service Termination: If a service was interrupted due to unforeseeable circumstances, courts assess whether partial payment is warranted.
  • Industry Standards and Precedents: Past rulings on similar cases help guide the court’s decision.
  • Evidence of Expectation of Payment: If the plaintiff can demonstrate that both parties expected payment, the claim is more likely to succeed.

Courts aim to balance fairness, ensuring that service providers receive reasonable payment while preventing excessive or unjustified claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What must be proven in a quantum meruit claim?
    The plaintiff must show that services were provided, accepted, and expected to be compensated. Evidence such as communications, invoices, or industry rates can support the claim.
  2. Can a quantum meruit claim apply if there was a verbal agreement?
    Yes, verbal agreements can support a quantum meruit claim if there is proof that services were performed with an expectation of payment.
  3. How is quantum meruit different from a breach of contract?
    Quantum meruit applies when a contract is missing or unenforceable, while breach of contract claims occur when an existing contract is violated.
  4. Can quantum meruit be claimed in employment disputes?
    Yes, especially in cases where an employee worked without a formal contract but had a reasonable expectation of being paid.
  5. What happens if the court denies a quantum meruit claim?
    If the claim is denied, the service provider may not receive compensation unless another legal avenue, such as a contract enforcement claim, is available.

If you need help with a quantum meruit claim, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.