Cedar City Patent Attorneys & Lawyers

A patent troll generally acquires or holds patents to pursue licensing revenue or infringement claims instead of making products. The label is informal and often disputed, so your response should focus on the patent, asserted claims, and claimant's conduct.

Key Takeaways

• Patent trolls usually seek revenue through patent licensing, settlements, or litigation rather than product sales.
• Not every nonpracticing entity, patent assertion entity, university, or inventor is a patent troll.
• Patent ownership and enforcement are generally lawful, but deceptive threats, bad-faith demands, or frivolous filings may create separ

...

Patent exhaustion determines when an authorized sale ends a patent owner's rights over the particular item sold. It affects buyers, resellers, manufacturers, licensees, and patent owners structuring product transactions.

Key Takeaways

• An authorized sale generally exhausts patent rights in the particular item sold.
• The buyer may usually use, resell, repair, or modify that item, but may not make new copies of the patented invention.
• Exhaustion can cover method claims and components that substantially embody a patented invention.
• Post-sale restrictions generally do not preserve patent i

...

Patent infringement defenses can challenge the infringement allegation, the patent's validity, its enforceability, or the patent owner's right to recover. Your strongest response will depend on the asserted claims, accused activity, product history, contracts, and available technical evidence.

Key Takeaways

• Non-infringement argues that the accused product or process does not meet every limitation of an asserted patent claim.
• Invalidity challenges the asserted patent claim itself, commonly through prior art, patent eligibility, or disclosure requirements.
• License, exhaustion, r

...

Key Takeaways

• Patent infringement inducement occurs when a party encourages or causes another to infringe, even if they don’t directly infringe themselves.
• Liability requires both direct infringement by someone and proof that the inducer knowingly encouraged that infringement.
• Courts have set a high standard of proof: inducement requires intent and knowledge that the acts infringed, not just negligence or recklessness.
• “Willful blindness” can substitute for actual knowledge if a party deliberately avoids confirming infringement.
• Defenses include showing lack of knowledge, non-infringing uses, or absence of direct infri

...

A licensing agreement gives a person or business defined permission to use another party's intellectual property. It controls the permitted use while generally allowing the owner to retain ownership.

Key Takeaways

• A licensor owns or controls the intellectual property, while a licensee receives permission to use it under stated conditions.
• A license transfers usage rights, not ownership, unless a separate provision expressly transfers ownership.
• Licenses may be exclusive, non-exclusive, or sole, and the practical effect depends on the agreement's scope.
• Core terms include permitted uses, territory, duratio

...